a lot of people are asking me: your stock dilution, how do you control the company? They worry that the company will get out of control, and I said I never worried about this. Because institutional investment investment NVC is to NVC make money, hope in the NVC make money, hope NVC gives them greater returns. I am a man who gets things done, investors including Goldman Sachs, Saif, likes me very much. Think highly of me, it is difficult for them to find me such a such a good state of mind, so dedicated, so painstaking work of the people. They agree with me very much, I want to do is nvc.

company's equity structure is very healthy, which is in line with my philosophy, 12 years ago, when I was on the initiative to set up such a pattern of equity.

NVC is founded. NVC venture capital is 1 million, I had money in the hands of more than 1 million, but I still find the two students. They are not for me to work, but as a shareholder, I give them two of the shares is 55%. I with they said, although I is the largest shareholder, but you two add up to more than I, if I will insist. You two can control me. If you want to absolutely control the company, as long as I get more than 60 thousand dollars, 60 thousand dollars, I can not get out of it? If my shares account for 51%, they have no use to oppose me, and finally have to listen to me, because I am a controlling shareholder. I don't believe that a few bosses will have the guts and the mentality.

institutional investors come in, to promote the standardization of the company's management and process optimization. In the past I had this idea, but pushed up, difficult. They ask you to do so, there is no room for bargaining, so push up quickly. But they are not involved in the day-to-day management of the company, but I have some constraints on the board of directors. They asked me to do things within the framework of the framework, which rules do not go, what can not touch, as long as they comply with the line. The original company is my own, I would like to do on how to do, and now not, even if it is not a major shareholder, they preferred shares, have priority, one vote can veto me. For example, Goldman Sachs, although only a few per cent of the equity, but it also has priority, you can vote veto.

NVC for so many years, has been on the fast response, risk decision. Through fast, we won the market and gained the status of today. In the early days of the venture, this approach is right, but also should be. If not fast, how to catch up with the scale of the enterprise? Opponents are sales of several billion, more than 10 million enterprises, small companies how to compete with them? Therefore, only with "fast" to win their "scale". But today can not in this way, to do what things, we should consider the risk. The style is rather stable institutional investors, rather than slowing down, and don't be too aggressive.

in fact, I have been very opposed to a single large. Founder has experienced ups and downs, to an enterprise from zero to success is very great, especially the grassroots entrepreneurs. He succeeded, concomitant with flowers and praise, his team and the circle will in some degree the apotheosis of his, so that people can easily impetuous, arrogance and conceit, coupled with the surrounding people flatter, with the passage of time, people will become headstrong, only to listen to good words. If no one to restrict him, put forward objections, no one from the side of the problem, once he made mistakes, it will be a devastating blow to the enterprise. I've seen so many bosses, including some famous entrepreneurs. A person to enterprise to success is not easy, after the success of maintaining a sober mind, calm state of mind is even harder. If a founder insisted on absolute holding, in essence, is a risky, irresponsible expression.

first is irresponsible to the family. The road of entrepreneurship is sad, but in fact he paid the family than pay more. So over the years, I rarely at home, the family care very little and rarely accompany family dinner, walking, traveling, rarely enjoy family happiness, family dedicate silently support my business, I support the development. They suffer from the suffering of ordinary people can not understand, I am to his wife, to the child, the parents are very guilty. If I self-willed his company down, persist in wilfully and arbitrarily, and is not responsible for the family.

followed by the brothers irresponsible. So many brothers followed me to play the world, recognized me as a person, follow me to start a business, today I succeeded, I certainly want to think of them. At the top of the meeting, I said to them, I have made a promise to you. I gave them a lot of options, they are now millionaires, millionaires. These options are applied to the board of directors.

many employees after graduating from college has followed me ten years of development, they devote all youth to the nvc. I can be like some of the bosses, immigrants, the wealth transfer, or cash. Business failures, and I have no relationship. But what about my brothers? Many owners will not be willing to give up like me, even if I am willing to be willing, if the enterprise has fallen, what all is the empty talk. In fact, this is not responsible for employees, the staff is not responsible.

to say a bit more, it is